How Conservatives Can Win Over Stoners – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana
How can Canada’s Conservatives win over stoners? Or whatever you want to call Canada’s class of cannabis connoisseurs, entrepreneurs, employees, casual consumers, and medical patients.
A lot of these people voted Liberal in 2015. I’m sure many plan to again. And can you blame them? Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre isn’t exactly drug-friendly.
His vision to make Canada the freest country on Earth depends on how you define freedom. It’s a topic we’ve covered before.
Suppose Conservatives want to win over stoners. They should listen to the head of a New Brunswick regional electoral district association.
Her submission calls on the Conservative Party of Canada to adopt a policy that will “abolish the excise tax on medical cannabis, fostering compassionate patient care and promoting its potential as a ‘Made in Canada’ safer alternative to addictive opioids.”
Conservatives can win over stoners (and many others) by solving the opioid crisis.
Who Cares About the Stoner Population?
“Stoner” may drum up images of a slacker glued to the couch, hitting a massive bong, and watching cartoons while eating children’s cereal and laughing their ass off.
Of course, this is a stereotype. All it takes is a simple internet search for “successful cannabis consumers,” and you’ll find a list of entrepreneurs and professionals.
So don’t brush off the “stoner” population as a bunch of burnt-out hippies. They’re regular people like you and me. Instead of enjoying a beer after work or a wine with dinner, we reach for cannabis.
Millions of Canadians reach for caffeine first thing in the morning. A fraction of them use THC in the same manner.
But because of cultural conditioning, some of us attribute much more to the herb than we should. Giving it credit for things that are our doing.
And like the mirror image of cannabis proponents, more conservative-minded Canadians attribute more to the herb than they should. They blame it for things that are the consumer’s responsibility.
Cannabis won’t make you successful, nor will it destroy your life. Your life is in your hands. You have freedom of choice. Cannabis is a flower. An inanimate object.
So, Conservatives would be wise to tap into Canada’s stoner population and win them over.
How Conservatives Can Win Over Medical Patients
Canada’s Conservatives can win over stoners by adopting the submission from the regional electoral district association.
From the Rationale:
Canadians seeking relief through medical cannabis face undue financial burdens due to the current excise tax. This policy removes such inequities, emphasizing compassionate care. Moreover, amid an opioid crisis, medical cannabis may serve as a safer, homegrown alternative to highly addictive opioids. Simultaneously, it bolsters our local cannabis industry, spurring economic growth. Removing this tax also aligns with principles of fiscal conservatism, eliminating a regressive levy that disproportionately impacts those with chronic health conditions. This policy aligns compassionate care, potential reduction of opioid dependence, and economic growth, demonstrating a balanced approach to health and industry.
Of course, this may not win over everybody. Canada’s medical cannabis patients have long memories. They remember how the Harper government targeted private cannabis gardens.
Harper dragged medical patients through the courts and forced them to defend their private property.
Although Allard v. Queen eventually sided with medical patients, if Harper had won the election in 2015, he probably would have appealed the decision.
So, if Conservatives want to win over Canada’s medical cannabis patients, they must start with an apology. And then, a pledge never to target private gardens again.
But, of course, politicians lie. Even more reason to abolish the system and institute a private law society.
How Conservatives Can Win Over Stoners
The submission from New Brunswick may see the Conservatives win over some medical cannabis patients, probably all the licensed producers, and some stoners along the way.
But what else can they do?
Consider the language of the submission. “Removing this tax also aligns with principles of fiscal conservatism.”
“Excise” taxes are sin taxes. Governments have determined that some of our actions are morally wrong but legally permissible. Ergo, an “excise” tax is charged.
But this idea is incompatible with individual freedom. It’s downright gross. Who decides that cannabis or gambling is immoral?
“Costs to the health care system!” some may cry, especially regarding tobacco and alcohol.
So? Legalize private insurance. If no one is harming you or your property, what business is it of yours? Be an adult. Stop caring how others are living their lives. It’s not your concern.
Especially when we’re talking about a benign herb like cannabis. This is a message Conservatives should be able to rally behind.
Excise taxes are cash grabs. No different from Trudeau’s carbon tax.
A Safe Supply of CBD
Conservatives can win over stoners by reading the literature on CBD, cravings, and opioid use.
Many of Canada’s cannabis connoisseurs are either supportive or sympathetic to B.C.’s drug decriminalization and “safe supply” of pharmaceutical drugs. Right now, Poilievre is not persuading any of them.
But here’s how to flip the narrative.
So why not a compromise? Conservatives can win over stoners by promising a taxpayer-funded supply of CBD cannabis flower.
CBD (or Cannabidiol) reduces cue-induced craving and anxiety in individuals addicted to heroin. At least, this was the result of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
By promoting CBD instead of “more opioids to solve the opioid crisis,” the Conservatives can tap into this “Made in Canada” strategy that doesn’t empower Big Pharma.
How Conservatives Can Win Over Stoners
Thanks to the Harper years, the Conservatives have an uphill battle with Canada’s medical cannabis patients. It may take decades to rebuild trust.
Therefore, Canada’s Conservatives would be wise to adopt this New Brunswick submission. They would be wise to expand this policy to the entire cannabis industry, medical or recreational.
Likewise, if one RCT isn’t enough, then they should campaign on funding more studies that examine CBD (and other phytocannabinoids) as treatment options for problematic opioid use.
But the worst thing Conservatives can do to win over stoners is repeat phrases from Alcoholics Anonymous and pretend like people who use drugs have mental disorders.
A good rule of thumb? Replace “drugs” with “guns,” and if it sounds like something Justin Trudeau might say, don’t say it.